To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again? |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:07:24 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wghuQdc3ny9FBr9CErxwwtk3pQMARPqDljT38mqz5gM=; b=ZltgIxB1B27PQCQoUcl5SlwhhgZeIs9TEHR2tFFGg29wOQrGLOXXQ7BiUoq2yf/NGB zKAADvpXeIIWVSkNB9IDm3jwb8m//j9B0o+iNk1E6SuJPk9ouJDyiYT+cvCj+gg50aFZ G8HBb4Lcl+yao0uC5eMSkpXStE1cEN9XLBcDo= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IsTBEc2TeSaF9f2ftATJY9MN6rtuw0DTON29kfCPLJUXON05t0BORU44RDe0UiFUgY Ykn/18SP1Nhvo1XDn/Eh9VYMyoKoD07yzKmOAN9EoNYdaXVdNNOCsAAPULNB+aa72a6e 0GTpaEkPhWPT+gPwaleZPW8nvMTszI0pgN/fw= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
AAAArrrrrgggghhhh
Sold the old 73kHz loading coil at FR Hamfest last year :-)
But yes. 73 was more interesting that 137 turned out to be, whilst not being impossible to do something worthwhile for everyone who managed to get on.
Andy
On 26 January 2011 10:38, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote: All, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Roger Lapthorn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Litz Wire and Class E, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Gary - G4WGT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |