Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?
From:	John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:29:54 -0500
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <003701cbbd63$daa305c0$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7


On 1/26/2011 10:10 AM, Warren Ziegler wrote:

Has anyone crossed the pond on 73kHz?


Warren,

Not 2-way, obviously. Just before the NOV expired, I did copy Laurie,G3AQC, in early December. See:

http://www.w1tag.com/files/AQC-9.jpg

The band was not pretty for receiving over here, with CFH (73.6???) andawful local noise being a problem.


John, W1TAG

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Roger Lapthorn Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Gary - G4WGT Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Alan Melia Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, John Andrews <= Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, [email protected] Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Peter Dodd Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Roger Lapthorn

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Who, mal hamilton
Next by Date:	Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, [email protected]
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, Warren Ziegler
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?, [email protected]
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]