To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna |
From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:15:40 -0800 (PST) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1295025340; bh=N+O/l1kBvRe7e2d+cxwER4j2iGftsThZ9/tyjW4xoiI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QH/QbdTjiK0btZoO0TNkQjNUG2vnS/SG3YRUK4Ri7qfpfnZZlqIQW8IW6bo/lh/I2iZqBxjx/tv0j8OLf5aZfVM0BT4NeoC3QYNJZxpjlGIzisp+IiSmAXK3O08iXZ52XCNq3LBuPlNh9tqOru70O20QM3C6/6f/XXBreM9ciEg= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xp0pbsYPfhzDSVZkqGg2ZN0TV2rBkKW392ZMci6JxatIff3K1/NefLf18/jBsfqtqn63uVcu43wUq1Cv+AR6bpesiAJlevpkw7sTOy23G+Rs9Drh/ey0zuqNs/f0db5NcpVU1BT/A5NOTaHkV8Mm5t/o7NaZXB3KLMiN75Z365s=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <op.vpa4ein0yzqh0k@pc-roelof> |
References: | <[email protected]> <op.vpan5am6yzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <op.vpat3gvlyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <1295011560.4164.19.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <op.vpa4ein0yzqh0k@pc-roelof> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Roelof,
what do you mean exactly by "difficult cases"?
Regards
Daniele
From: Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 5:36:08 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna > Hi Roelof, > > Some interesting comments there. > > On the topic of feeder pick up Alan G3NYK and myself have had many > conversations over the years about ways to deal with the problem and a > method we've never got around to trying but I now have some components > to try (when I get a "roundtooit") is to convert (E/O) electrical to > optical at the feedpoint and then conduct by fibre through the noise > field converting back to demodulated baseband in the shack. The problem > of powering the feedpoint equipment may be overcome by using batteries > (possibly solar-charged) thus avoiding further noise pick up and > re-radiation from power source cabling. > > 73 Yes, this is an excellent idea and to be honest I have already acquired the necessary parts for some time, but have not come round yet to use them. An other idea that I have tested and can give excellent results in difficult cases is to use CAT5 network cable. I used rf-isolating transformers at both ends for the signal pair and common mode chokes at both ends for the pair carrying power to the antenna. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: report for DJ6GT on +/- 137.7KHz in QRSS3, Scholz, Marco |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Measurements, g4gvw |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |