To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna |
From: | pws <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:26:06 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <op.vpan5am6yzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <op.vpat3gvlyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <04DC6D14A81F4542B1D2189A5440F3D5@DennisPC> <[email protected]> <277DA8CD9ECE43D989BD77869417F642@DennisPC> <8DBC66D8CECB40DDB2E4630CDD4B20BA@PcMinto> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101026 SUSE/3.0.10 Thunderbird/3.0.10 |
Hi Roelof et al., Thanks for all those comments about ideas, alternative parts, and sources! > ... > http://www.kitsandparts.com/index.php > ... Ordered! @Mal, g3kev: indeed I'm thinking about ICs like AD797 or LT1028 at the 2nd stage for low frequencies. Will try it against the "native" solution... 73 de Peter |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: 8970.02 Hz + 10th, F4DTL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna?, Claudio Pozzi |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, Minto Witteveen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |