Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna |
| From: | Minto Witteveen <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:42:44 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=aYzzns7EVVoGJmJiEPrC4jK7jKJDgWKOFyPvoujd86E=; b=VJlT4Y0cott8Bod/leW9VfoBYJI+rX1lDddKDFd2l7tf1KyJuABmgMxG4v5CGgwMOX +chsvk923CTbIC3bMd6s65HICPXu+VyBa6rI60SV/uc8czr6djyh7o7Q8LaCCZ07aNxj +nvCGnLsOMoryqmuwpbn0k5UuLX87yUOnYdqg= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=O8dqPxdtvW7Nqbe6OkHkRloW0648HJdYRbDqcrrjrQkraBdSQEyyF9dMLZWwwTfxWL oU7i6TM817o+YGcYWxj2ux5uk7gOlAjVcB5ObvjNPAG2ykPzeRvXKSiRH/DFA/9YJJnb RWXbEQesx+EaSolSsS7spY7SsWXAJ+M/4lcuA= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <op.vpan5am6yzqh0k@pc-roelof> <[email protected]> <op.vpat3gvlyzqh0k@pc-roelof> <04DC6D14A81F4542B1D2189A5440F3D5@DennisPC> <[email protected]> <277DA8CD9ECE43D989BD77869417F642@DennisPC> <8DBC66D8CECB40DDB2E4630CDD4B20BA@PcMinto> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Roelof, Yes at 200 mW there should not be a problem.I use a 2N3866 in my 2 mini-whips, on paper the 2N5109 en the 2N3866 looked comparable enough (as far as I remember). The mini-whip is much better than my current experiment - a single loop magnetic loop antenna (mini-whip has more signal, comparable s/n). Regards, Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:19 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna Hello Menno,The dissipated power of the 2N5109 with a supply voltage of 12 V is about 200 mW.So the BF199 will probably survive. 2N5109's are still availeble here: http://www.kitsandparts.com/index.php with a lot of other goodies. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna?, Claudio Pozzi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: VLF_transmission, Lubos OK2BVG |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, pws |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Mini-Whip Antenna, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |