Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Best SL-settings for VLF ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Best SL-settings for VLF ?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:22:10 +0100
In-reply-to: <2079284000.14350.1295449502083.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb080>
References: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> <2079284000.14350.1295449502083.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb080>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Horst,

I may give you a wideband.usr file which allows you to check the whole band your soundcard monitors. If you run it for about 12 hours, you/we will see the SNR of the MSKs and Alphas but mains hum as well. This was proven to be the best way to start checking the situation of a given location.
You just have to adjust the B (brightness) slider and the range of displayed levels to get a proper display.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 19.01.2011 16:05, schrieb Horst Stöcker:
Hello,
after several tests in the past weeks receiving VLF it seems that I found the best postion for my MiniWhip.
Now I am a bit confused about the best SL-settings to use for VLF-reception. I collected different ones.
Actually I am running the VLF_1mHz_MSK.USR.
Changing the lower water fall to 11,904 kHz I really see a strong trace. I hope this is RDL1.
With this S/R I should be able to see transmissions in the dreamers band.
I would like to compare someones capture with mine with the same settings to see if my settings are already OK.
Horst  

NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!    
Jetzt informieren: http://produkte.web.de/go/webdefreephone

Attachment: wide.USR
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>