Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Earth Electrodes

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Earth Electrodes
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:37:33 -0000
References: <80E0204D3E534137903FE0B8E499597F@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> <C38D87D2AED243D59ED8357663143FF4@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> <009d01cb9bc8$73fe6f10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stefan
If your 600m wire is average 6 metres above the ground then you have an elevated grounded loop whose natural resonance is the length of wire plus the same length earth return plus 6 m vertical at each end ie 1200m plus 12 metres == 1212 metres.
This is an old trick used on 80m and 160m to make a vertical loop antenna where space is restricted. ie one half of the antenna is elevated above ground and the other half is made up by the ground, and can be in the form of a rectangle or square or triangle. Half the rectangle or square or triangle is elevated normally as high as possible above ground and the ground is a MIRROR image to complete the loop.
 
An earth mode antenna is the type of antenna used by the CAVE fraternity to communicate through ground ie below ground in a CAVE to the ground above.
ie short distance communications.
 
In my opinion an earth mode antenna is intended to communicate short distances EARTH to EARTH, TX into the earth using a probe rod and RX this signal
using another probe rod . Your grounded loop is propagating the signal into the ether with the intention of it being received by an elevated RX antenna some hundreds of metres or Kilometres away at a distant location.
 
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Earth Electrodes

Mal,

No.

It depends on the frequency. On 8970 Hz and lower it is an earth antenna.

Mal, it was so often explained how an earth antenna works. Do we really have to repeat that each few weeks? Really? OK, once again:

And earth electrode antenna is a loop antenna where the current return path is in the earth. So there are two electrodes and the TX can be applied anywhere between these two electrodes. Furthermore i have never said to have 2 wires (600m each) but just one wire. The TX ground is connected to the first (near) ground rod(s) and the center of the coax is applied to the wire which is in 6m height (average). The total wire length is about 700m and the electrode spacing is about 600m. So the far away electrode is in 600m distance.

Rogers and my earth antenna is not a grounded loop antenna since the wire is not closed! The ground is a part of the loop, thats the difference between a usual loop and an earth antenna.

I can run a current at any frequency. I have tried 10 Hz (just for testing) and DC and 100 Hz and so on. I hope you can agree that the current MUST come back trough the ground if the frequency is 0 (DC)!! So, the lower the conductivity, the higher the effective area of the loop (skin effect!!!) and thus the efficiency. Since i am on a hill there (500m ASL) and there are almost only stones, the conductivity is very low. This causes more effort in arranging a suitable earth rod system ( i am using 30 rods, 0.4m long each, spaced about 1m) but is is interesting :-)

There is no matching from 8 Ohm to 50 Ohm since my PA has not an output impedance of 8 Ohm and my antenna has not an input impedance of 50 Ohm ;-)
The goal is to get as much antenna current as possible, so there is no need to match something to 50 Ohm. Since the cable length is always <<< Lambda, there is no need to match something! I can measure the antenna current directly by using a digital multimeter(attached picture). The power can be measured on the DC side of the PA, since the efficiency is quasi 100%. So you can calculate the losses.

If the earth antenna has a overall resistance of 500 Ohm and you can and want to generate 500 W (assuming the reactive Z component is negligible) you just have to apply 500 V (rms) on the wire, thats all!

Earth antenna does not mean that the wire is on the ground but that the current comes back in the earth!

So, hope to have answered the questions, in december.

73, Stefan

Am 14.12.2010 20:52, schrieb mal hamilton:
Stefan
You now admit that your antenna is in FACT a LOSSY DIPOLE and not an earth antenna
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Earth Electrodes

Chris, LF,

Am 14.12.2010 17:27, schrieb Chris:
HiStefan,
Yes, but 600m is VERY long! The wire even laying on the ground I would expect to radiate quite well at 137 with that length! And how many watts?? ERP??
I am sure 8970 would do well through the ground at the sort of powers being spoken about. Probably ideal for submarines, as Roger says!
Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.
Well, my earth antenna is grounded at the ends and TX power was about 250 W. The mode was DFCW-600. The receiver was at Michael Oexner using a PA0RDT design. ERP? No idea, probably some few uW. Its not so easy to calculate the losses.

Yes, on 137 kHz the wire length comes close to lambda/4 and above so it acts not just like a pure earth antenna but rather as a combination of this and a very loss dipole. On 137, my power was 100 W at this test.

The antenna was built to do local tests but seems to work suitable on 137. So it is a fixed antenna, my only fixed one. And it is a very quiet location. This makes it interesting to use it as a RX antenna too!...

73, Stefan

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Earth Electrodes

Hi Chris,

But how do you explain that i have crossed 49.6 km with a 600m spaced earth electrode antenna on 8970 Hz? It was rather summer time than winther (regarding QRN)! With the same antenna, my 137 kHz signal was seen 20 dB above noise near Paris in DFCW-3!?????

73, Stefan


Am 14.12.2010 15:15, schrieb Chris:
Hi Mal,
Yes, that is what I had concluded years ago. No harm in trying though!
Further to your previous e-mail to LF, looks to me like beacons are now becoming the norm on 136/7kHz band and below. I have no problem with that personally, indeed, I think it preferable to a QSO taking forever! I woud like to see full idents though, no matter how slow.
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>