To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:06:37 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dtX9PpG3UGhTE5QXf6d4KkPtKXgy0SIke92CKgoyrZ4=; b=wCl4HUS2f6C3/W3FxKVe0R+PPPnLV35qy9kl11/MSzwX7aBmbyzfKjgmYZF6eodY2H mB7vsl/qx5ZCYoxJ0rZi1xWSKRJY80LeUEuQzVOHYHrR35UslFEBc0Q2aEh75Yo0o0up 07k3lnQ2LGe1MvhiGiUn4f20+/wpJ6NuZtWA8= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OH1WGHejwmW1wwmla2JIDDn8MdnZwPzVslISdNGclOK7suHHIeyxMPkUKy3rxGde5J FL7G43Pbn/dAZ+63p4DyfUngjCFDfd+tHR+I+2B6JAEQMuXSql2BgOUkTuBDcAaltlW2 p0ZL4Sks7cA9D87b/Eay+ymARI4yzQ6QqX7IA= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1567AC3A96624647ADC1F52EF1A1E625@JimPC> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Nothing here. But with 15dB S/N at Jim's in a tenth of the bandwidth I'm looking it, and at at least twice the range, probably not surprising. I'll try going narrower, but have never tested the SDR-IQ at these limits so not sure how the display / calibration holds up.
Andy
On 31 December 2010 14:01, Chris Osborn <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ, Chris Osborn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ, Chris Osborn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF - G3XIZ, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |