Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site
From: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:33:36 +0200
In-reply-to: <op.vftrugb1yzqh0k@pc1>
References: <[email protected]> <5EFBC941A663479B96E4F35342BC9217@Uwe> <008301cb2280$79a6bd80$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <CFF3CC61484F45BDA80D32F00E4B606C@Uwe> <op.vfsmoaauyzqh0k@pc1> <[email protected]> <op.vftrugb1yzqh0k@pc1>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

Hello Roelof, Stefan, and the group,

I have a Perseus, but don't use it for VLF due to the input filters, so cannot comment on its performance there. What I did use for "portable" operation (before discovering the 96 kHz soundcard in my Ideapad S10 netbook) was an SDR-IQ (which has a much lower lower cutoff frequency than Perseus), or an E-MU 0202. No visible difference comparing all these in the "upper" VLF spectrum, though. It's much more important to have an very 'linear' input preamp at the antenna, or -if that's not sufficient- a preselector. Living less than 100 km away from DHO38, their signal dominates even the local 'transmitters' on 15.626 kHz ;-) See http://www.qsl.net/dl4yhf/vlf_rdf/latest_vlf_spectra.htm for some examples. Most of these spectrograms (especially the 'RDF' ones) were made with the E-MU. The E-field & H-field comparisons were made with the SDR-IQ.

Cheers,
 Wolf .

Roelof Bakker schrieb:
Hello Stefan,

The external soundcard is a EMU 0202 USB.
To be honest, I have not looked in depth on its performance as VLF receiver, as I own a PERSEUS SDR and have no need for it.

I believe that Wolfgang, DL4YHF also uses one for his remote VLF reception station.
Maybe he can comment on the performance.

73,
Roelof






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>