To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:09:21 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <op.vfsmoaauyzqh0k@pc1> |
References: | <[email protected]> <5EFBC941A663479B96E4F35342BC9217@Uwe> <008301cb2280$79a6bd80$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <CFF3CC61484F45BDA80D32F00E4B606C@Uwe> <op.vfsmoaauyzqh0k@pc1> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hello Roelof, Am 13.07.2010 19:54, schrieb Roelof Bakker: I have an external soundcard which has a 192 kHz sample rate.This makes it possible to receive 0-96 kHz on your soundcard with excellent results. Is it the EMU 0404 ? Is there really a benefit? I mean, i most cases it doesn't matter if the soundcard noise is say -140 dB or - 120 dB when your noise background is at least -100 dB. I have also thought about buying a better soundcard but i am still not convinced that it is worth the investment. Of course, the extended frequency range might be interesting... 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Can you listen/watch now to the dreamers band with suitable sensibility? |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site, James Cowburn |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site, di2am |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: SAQrx soundcard VLF receiver moved to new web site, Roelof Bakker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |