To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF-Noise |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:44:41 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <004e01cb032e$3f257730$0201a8c0@Clemens04> |
References: | <001401cb02f4$4aa9d130$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00b701cb030b$c6268d50$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <01CA4D0605FB409ABD7D2F0A98DC46BD@df2py> <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4374C6BF460@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <36D7C2EAF95A4E7293AC6ABF9307BE19@df2py> <004e01cb032e$3f257730$0201a8c0@Clemens04> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/10.53 (Win32) |
Hello Clemens, Your observation is correct.This has also been mentioned by Paul Nicholson, who has a first class ELF-VLF monitoring station. However this frequency will ask for much larger loading coil. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: VLF-Noise, Clemens Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | R: LF: VLF-Noise, daniele.tincani |
Previous by Thread: | LF: VLF-Noise, Clemens Paul |
Next by Thread: | R: LF: VLF-Noise, daniele.tincani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |