Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF-Noise

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: VLF-Noise
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:56:23 +0100
References: <001401cb02f4$4aa9d130$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00b701cb030b$c6268d50$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <01CA4D0605FB409ABD7D2F0A98DC46BD@df2py> <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4374C6BF460@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <36D7C2EAF95A4E7293AC6ABF9307BE19@df2py> <004e01cb032e$3f257730$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <op.vdqjkrbryzqh0k@pc1>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
The RX sensitivity at 4 kcs is a lot less than 9 kcs therefore it might
appear a better choice but one would need to be convinced and more research
is needed.
I prefer to go the other way up to say 12 kcs and contend with the static by
improving the TX ERP and improving RX antenna etc.
Some cannot manage to put out a decent signal on 137  or 500 kcs never mind
VLF, DREAM on, go to church and think Miracles or Impossibilities.
g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF-Noise


> Hello Clemens,
>
> Your observation is correct.
> This has also been mentioned by Paul Nicholson, who has a first class
> ELF-VLF monitoring station.
> However this frequency will ask for much larger loading coil.
>
> 73,
> Roelof, pa0rdt
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>