Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | R: LF: VLF-Noise |
| From: | <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:15:08 +0200 |
| References: | <001401cb02f4$4aa9d130$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00b701cb030b$c6268d50$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <01CA4D0605FB409ABD7D2F0A98DC46BD@df2py> <16BC8B3CA8672445BC2A29B4C14A26D4374C6BF460@exlnmb01.eur.nsroot.net> <36D7C2EAF95A4E7293AC6ABF9307BE19@df2py> <004e01cb032e$3f257730$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <op.vdqjkrbryzqh0k@pc1> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | AcsDNGfU+aRyi29qRgW/QdnpHHvX+QAA4eOW |
| Thread-topic: | LF: VLF-Noise |
May be this one could be of some interest? http://www.vlf.it/naturalnoisefloor/naturalnoisefloor.htm Cheers D. ________________________________ Da: [email protected] per conto di Roelof Bakker Inviato: gio 03/06/2010 19.44 A: [email protected] Oggetto: Re: LF: VLF-Noise Hello Clemens, Your observation is correct. This has also been mentioned by Paul Nicholson, who has a first class ELF-VLF monitoring station. However this frequency will ask for much larger loading coil. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt <<winmail.dat>> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VLF-Noise, Roelof Bakker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF-Noise, Clemens Paul |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF-Noise, Roelof Bakker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF-Noise, Clemens Paul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |