To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: EARTH |
From: | "Mike.WE0H" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:20:45 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <003001cae0b0$820545d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <681228559-1271689925-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1565535176-@bda171.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>,<003b01cadfd7$a44098e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156E4C@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> <003001cae0b0$820545d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
I think connector's that are gold plated are done that way because the general public looks at a gold plated item as high quality. If it was tarnished silver plated, then it wouldn't look so pretty. We all know silver is a darn good conductor for RF so we use it when we can. The audio-phools use their fancy looking gold plating 'cause it looks pretty...hi hi...We aren't phools so we use silver 'cause it's lower cost and is a better RF conductor. Mike WE0H Mal wrote: Rik I have not investigated gold v silver but high quality low loss plugs/socket pins are gold plated, if what you say is correct why not silver? mal/g3kev |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: EARTH, g4gvw |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: EARTH, Chris Trayner |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: EARTH, g4gvw |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: EARTH, Chris Trayner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |