Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: LF:
Callsigns
> Hi Horst,
> I don't agree. If a station is
beaconing in QRSS3, time surely is hardly a
> problem. Why they can't
send a full callsign , say, every fifth time beats
> me. Anyway, isn't
the prefix of more interest to listeners who may not be
on
> this
site?
> Chris, G4AYT.
> ----- Original Message -----
>
From: "Horst Stöcker" <
[email protected]>
>
To: <
[email protected]>
>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: LF:
Callsigns
>
>
> Hello Chris, in standard CW this will be
no problem. But in QRSS3, for
> example, it sometimes just takes too
long. While testing in QRSS3 or other
> "slow" modes, I send CW ID for
local operators. As the S/N ratio is worse
> not everyone who can read
my QRSS3 is able to read my standard CW. Thats
> part of the game . .
.
> Horst
>
> .> -----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Chris" <
[email protected]>
>
> Gesendet: 04.01.10 17:19:13
> > An: "RSGB LF Group" <
[email protected]>
>
> Betreff: LF: Callsigns
>
> >I wish beaconing stations
would send a full callsign, even every so
> > often, in the same
mode as they are transmitting. I can undertsand
> > not doing so
during a QSO once contact has been established (to save
> >
time).
> >
> > Chris, G4AYT.
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
>
Preisknaller:
WEB.DE DSL Flatrate
für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
>
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/>
>
>
