Hi Horst,
I don't agree. If a station is beaconing in QRSS3, time surely is hardly a
problem. Why they can't send a full callsign , say, every fifth time beats
me. Anyway, isn't the prefix of more interest to listeners who may not be on
this site?
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns
Hello Chris, in standard CW this will be no problem. But in QRSS3, for
example, it sometimes just takes too long. While testing in QRSS3 or other
"slow" modes, I send CW ID for local operators. As the S/N ratio is worse
not everyone who can read my QRSS3 is able to read my standard CW. Thats
part of the game . . .
Horst
.> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Gesendet: 04.01.10 17:19:13
An: "RSGB LF Group" <[email protected]>
Betreff: LF: Callsigns
I wish beaconing stations would send a full callsign, even every so
often, in the same mode as they are transmitting. I can undertsand
not doing so during a QSO once contact has been established (to save
time).
Chris, G4AYT.
___________________________________________________________
Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
|
