Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Callsigns

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:41:45 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lsCFCxIUkDBmQQKEawwvsP0p6oqytNqqQmAerFV3aRI=; b=soioxmOCJw8tDZyDWZSo7E/Mk8lV9TKZk0Fd1Cb51hiOtJWI3cwJ4mCn5bakvP7j08 WINThFUDRTwU/EWtTV0ROrLKa7p36DV7D6lhzbDmY9k5zdM/8pKeUN8//o2dkesuFvaY rkaklIOxfCgQaNnI9yfDiUX1NVafZK6BFHfcI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wdi6Hxr0yn0LDxGpUeJE8b2yxcUBUOKMptD4rfLZbqTHkXaFqaHV3lvNFC0KuED95v 6Ig1SW3X1U16kV+jkeUS4VUv359FtWnSHAzhd98Sxpq5CRqSSxIETC0jy/wWVVzDjWLO AWOOw71b9R44XxJ0PY9PviXQnh0szssS9+mgc=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <007501ca8d6e$86e3de80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <[email protected]> <EA211B7682AD4B5A8785FBA2D4491287@IBM7FFA209F07C> <007501ca8d6e$86e3de80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Mal,

So you've no strong views on slow QRS modes. That's good..

73s
Roger

2010/1/4 mal hamilton <[email protected]>
Chris
QRS 3 is manageable for a full call but when it gets to QRS 60, 120, 240 and
480 it is pathetic and unnecessary because on LF/MF  when  QSB hits the
whole dots/dashes are broken up and meaningless.ie gibberish
Still some insist so what can one do ????????????????
I ignore anything slower than QRS 10 even if it comes from outer Mongolia !!
G3KEV


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns


> Hi Horst,
> I don't agree. If a station is beaconing in QRSS3, time surely is hardly a
> problem. Why they can't send a full callsign , say, every fifth time beats
> me. Anyway, isn't the prefix of more interest to listeners who may not be
on
> this site?
> Chris, G4AYT.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns
>
>
> Hello Chris, in standard CW this will be no problem. But in QRSS3, for
> example, it sometimes just takes too long. While testing in QRSS3 or other
> "slow" modes, I send CW ID for local operators. As the S/N ratio is worse
> not everyone who can read my QRSS3 is able to read my standard CW. Thats
> part of the game . . .
> Horst
>
> .> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Chris" <[email protected]>
> > Gesendet: 04.01.10 17:19:13
> > An: "RSGB LF Group" <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: LF: Callsigns
>
> >I wish beaconing stations would send a full callsign, even every so
> > often, in the same mode as they are transmitting. I can undertsand
> > not doing so during a QSO once contact has been established (to save
> > time).
> >
> > Chris, G4AYT.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
> http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
>
>
>





--
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>