Chris
QRS 3 is manageable for a full call but when it gets to QRS 60, 120, 240 and
480 it is pathetic and unnecessary because on LF/MF  when  QSB hits the
whole dots/dashes are broken up and meaningless.ie gibberish
Still some insist so what can one do ????????????????
I ignore anything slower than QRS 10 even if it comes from outer Mongolia !!
G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>

Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns


> Hi Horst,
> I don't agree. If a station is beaconing in QRSS3, time surely is hardly a
> problem. Why they can't send a full callsign , say, every fifth time beats
> me. Anyway, isn't the prefix of more interest to listeners who may not be
on
> this site?
> Chris, G4AYT.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Horst Stöcker" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Callsigns
>
>
> Hello Chris, in standard CW this will be no problem. But in QRSS3, for
> example, it sometimes just takes too long. While testing in QRSS3 or other
> "slow" modes, I send CW ID for local operators. As the S/N ratio is worse
> not everyone who can read my QRSS3 is able to read my standard CW. Thats
> part of the game . . .
> Horst
>
> .> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: "Chris" <[email protected]>
> > Gesendet: 04.01.10 17:19:13
> > An: "RSGB LF Group" <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: LF: Callsigns
>
> >I wish beaconing stations would send a full callsign, even every so
> > often, in the same mode as they are transmitting. I can undertsand
> > not doing so during a QSO once contact has been established (to save
> > time).
> >
> > Chris, G4AYT.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
> http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
>
>
>