Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 500 kHz WSPR de VE1JF or who the heck is this guy?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 500 kHz WSPR de VE1JF or who the heck is this guy?
From: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:18:28 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

Hi Jim

As a member of RAC, I wonder where you get the authorization for making a statement such as this:
'Regulatory Affairs wing of RAC, who are Industry Canada’s gatekeepers'???

RAC has no regulatory power nor formal stating with IC. They wish they did, but they do not and as a member my vote is they should never have.

I would also like to make it clear that the Canadian Developmental Service experiments are strictly that 'Developmental Service' and have no legal ability to communicate with those in the amateur service. It concerns me to see reports of undisciplined experimental operators attempting or completely QSOs with stations in the amateur service in EU. This was the main reason I opted out of the 600m experiment in the first place.

Another reason I withdrew my application for experimentation on 600m was this very attitude from RAC and its complete lack of willingness to advocate for real amateur radio experiments. Instead they presented us with watered down commercial developmental licenses advocated by those with zero prior interest in LF and zero operating experience on LF. With no ability to explore REAL communication with other amateurs world wide and a complete lack of respect for and knowledge about the existing LF experimenters group that exists in Canada I withdrew in disgust of the entire situation as the egos in Ottawa and elsewhere have taken over...

If the chair or the band planning committee would have had any real interest in LF then were where they years ago when REAL amateur LF experiments where being conducted when we pleaded for others to get involved?

Had you had a real interest you would have your answers already as the systems have been developed and will simply sit idle at this station until there is REAL amateur radio on 600m.

I certainly hope you don't entertain to start planning the future 2200m band without consulting with the long term users here in Canada.

73 Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk








Jim and Hannelore Fisher wrote:

Congratulations on #1000, G3XIZ!

I chair the Radio Amateurs of Canada (RAC) LF/MF/HF Band Planning Committee, and several of us are interested in participating in the recently-authorized experiments on 500 kHz. We are receiving active support on this effort from the Regulatory Affairs wing of RAC, who are Industry Canada’s gatekeepers. This period is preliminary to the coming world meeting where this will be discussed. We hope to get several stations transmitting 25% of the time and a lot more across Canada receiving, so it should add to WSPR’s activity and spotting at this frequency.

I’m not sure what you were saying about hand-sent CW vs. WSPR; I also love CW but am amazed what WSPR can offer. Other authorized Canadian participants in this program are already using CW, and most of my 100,000+ QSOs over 53+ years have been CW, but we are expecting our little group to propose two frequencies (we must be specific) and use 503.9 WSPR beacon mode, break in using the WSJT WSPR mode, and QSY to our “working frequency”, where we can use any mode within the 1 kHz permissible bandwidth. Contenders for working frequency QSOs might vary from some of the JT modes to OLIVIA to CW depending on what signal levels we are experiencing with feasible antennas and our power limitations. The purpose of all this will be able to understand whether 600M can offer utility for ham radio-scale stations for emergency, and how its usability varies with conditions including aurora.

Last night, using my 160M 1/2w sloper aimed at the Pacific Rim, I spotted SM6BHZ over 40 times on 502.4+.

We are looking for info on successful approaches to generating WSPR and other modes on 500 kHz. I’m presently thinking of a transverter with my transceiver’s transverter output, but I’m open and others in our group may want to try other approaches.

73,

Jim, VE1JF


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>