Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Running mW wspr

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Running mW wspr
From: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:58:02 -0000
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <1043CB7D895D4161B1C87CDD140332A2@AGB> <0CADF4DD71FD43A2A8384463754F6344@AGB> <[email protected]> <1C14999758D149228277CBBC2446F1D7@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Yes just seeing decodes from Gary at the moment ,,I will qro 100mW .. thats a west coast qro as opposed to a east coast one .....

G ..

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John P-G" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 8:44 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Running  mW wspr


G

10dB might be a bit too much, your previous decodes were around -25/-28dB here. Perhaps at some peaks of QSB, later in the night we might still strike lucky.

Am considering knocking up a transverter for 500kHz and replacing the MF ATU out at the feedpoint (currently have an HF auto-atu there) to allow me to radiate some signals on 500 again.

Cheers,

John


Graham wrote:
2334 45 mW drive to the antenna .. slight problem zeroing the meter as there is 60 uW of energy coming back in from the atu ....
so thats about   -10 dB  down on the  previous level

G ..

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John P-G" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 7:18 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Running  mW wspr




Graham wrote:


Crazy system .....  spot  just in from John  !


I thought your mW signal was meant to be a challenge, but of course Roger's already discovered that WSPR will decode signals that you can't hear, and are often so weak on a waterfall that QRSS3 would be a struggle (despite what someone here repeatedly fails to comprehend)

Can you go any lower?

John
GM4SLV











<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>