LF: RE: Re: RE: QRS 240

["Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>]

Mal,

 

I admit, not nearly as many as you.

 

But why do you keep criticising what others do. It is as if they don’t do it your way it isn’t correct.

 

I would be much nicer to advise & help others, don’t you think?

 

I remember when I first came on 136KHz you did help me & it was good advice, I appreciated it, but your attitude seems to have changed, why?

 

Gary – G4WGT.

 

---

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 03 January 2009 20:48
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Re: RE: QRS 240

 

29 countries worked on 137 all on cw. What is your score.

g3kev

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Gary - G4WGT

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 8:28 PM

Subject: LF: RE: QRS 240

 

LF,

 

Oh my god, he’s doing it on 136KHz now !!!

 

Gary - G4WGT.

 

---

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of mal hamilton
Sent: 03 January 2009 20:22
To: rsgb
Subject: LF: QRS 240

 

Its hard to believe that someone on 137 is sending at qrs240 sec dot !!!.Think how long this would take for a QSO, surprisingly there is no QSB on rhe carrier. I cannot wait for an ID. I could read it at qrs 1

g3kev

 

---

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1872 - Release Date: 1/2/2009 1:10 PM