Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5

from [Rik Strobbe] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:55:20 +0100
In-reply-to: <20090125180430.1d63e1c7@lurcher>
References: <20090125092908.0aec06a4@lurcher> <7EC707A6E2D94414AEBBC52C6159581C@JimPC> <AAD643EEA70C4FC99B4B3E17041C8F54@JimPC> <002001c97f0a$cf16fac0$ae01a8c0@youry0mkaz8jaq> <20090125165335.47fc3399@lurcher> <7690F13DCE5D44BA8A5AA126607E7979@JimPC> <[email protected]> <20090125180430.1d63e1c7@lurcher>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 



At the moment there is no bandplan, but general concensus would
indicate "beacons at the band edges - real QSOs in the middle".

The current WSPR activity around 503.5 (502.0 dial) seems reasonable,
although moving up a few hundred Hz wouldn't hurt, say to 502.3 dial
which gives a 200Hz window at 503.7 - 503.9


I agree with that.
In addition I would suggest to keep QRSS QSO's (lazy men's CW, very slow CW or wthatever called) also at one of the band edges. A strong QRSS signal in the centre of the band can block a good part of the 3kHz segment during a longer time for weak CW signals.
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T 

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: XGJ, victor13
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: Re: Band plan, Rik Strobbe
Previous by Thread:  RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5, Mike Dennison
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5, Graham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]