Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5

from [Mike Dennison] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5
From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:56:52 -0000
In-reply-to: <00f101c97f2d$e530b440$6401a8c0@asus>
References: <20090125092908.0aec06a4@lurcher>, <EEACEE2E6F034BDEAD5A00E8547FF820@AGB>, <00f101c97f2d$e530b440$6401a8c0@asus>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 
On 25 Jan 2009 at 20:45, Gary - G4WGT wrote:

> My comment was to follow the WSPR recommended method as adopting ERP
> would mean there are two "standards".

The current WSPR system is already approximatley ERP as at HF the 
difference between RF and ERP is unlikely to be more than a few dB. 

Mike, G3XDV
=========
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: WSPR 503.5 - G4WGT, Markus Vester
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5, John P-G
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: WSPR 503.5, Alberto di Bene
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5, Rik Strobbe
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]