To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:13:49 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=XqgNknyatiYvZuPRxoo03vJGg8R1oAexeUlenxL++tr1uXmMkA8Bte7V+FEnteQIcpgJ/94ku0zfkivpSufgbMzNcXrPK9L4U3jHEevyv7DpJc1+IN7Wcc0aXjd6rV1pwVaxxbl05NnnSfjvxkj7iLggtIoV5KXiPQqGMAdKJLM= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <006201c97e70$d60f3e90$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> |
References: | <5F3E5A778D18465DB680DC48CC7FBE48@JimPC> <006201c97e70$d60f3e90$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Andrey, LF GroupThanks for the screen shot. I guess you are still having problems getting WSPR to work properly - so I have attached a spectrogram of the transmitted signal so that you can use a "human WSPR decoder" instead :-). Seriously, you can just about see enough detail in the two spectrograms to be fairly certain it is the same signal you received. Cheers, Jim Moritz73 de M0BMU
M0BMU_IO91_30.jpg |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: English,grammar etc, Chris Trayner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz, dave.riley3 |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz, Andrey rn3agc |
Next by Thread: | LF: WSPR Beacon on 503.5kHz, dave.riley3 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |