Dave
The fashion today is to avoid morse and the soldering iron. My message did
not say avoid other radio amateurs.
73 de Mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Towers" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer
> mal wrote:
>
> > The average radio amateur today is an appliance operator and probably
> > never heard about morse code or a soldering iron. Avoid them both!!
> > G3KEV
>
> Hi Mal
> how can you know when to avoid a licenced radio amateur, how do you
> describe "average"?
> You do not "see" them but only have a call-sign to go by.
> What are your terms of reference to make such a statement?
>
> Many of us suffered strokes or worse during our amateur career and
> thus became unable to remember and use CW well enough to "pass a test",
> and thus were barred from the HF bands.
>
> Fortunately this has been corrected and we "so called" Class B licencees
> could enjoy a taste of the HF bands denied to us, not because of lack of
> ability but due to impairments.
> Despite being visually impaired now from stroke induced brain damage, I
> can still use a soldering iron and construct-takes more time and more
> care, but I get there!
>
> CW retention and use is no longer a possibility though!
>
> I operate without causing interference to others and know how to and am
> able to construct and repair test equipment and modern transceivers.
>
> Does this make me a leper in your eyes?
>
> It matters not to me whether you Mal, or your ilk, avoids me when I
> eventually get onto LF bands, but I would welcome a more understanding
> attitude from you/them, and less bigoted comments concerning those not
> blessed with your/their abilities.
> Perhaps some died in the wool CW operators should look outside of their
> box before using voice or keyboard and passing judgement!
> dave
> G8SZX Glenfield Leicester IO92jp
> webpage
> www.g8szx.mediumwaveradio.org
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > *From:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > *To:* [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > *Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2008 11:23 PM
> > *Subject:* Re: LF: CW Skimmer
> >
> > Actualy I do not agree with that statement. It is only in the
> > present state of the art that you might say that a machine cannot
> > read poorly sent morse. It is not so many years ago that the present
> > state of the art was considered beyond the reach of machines!
> >
> > It is surely not beyond the wit of man to imagine that a future
> > generation of machines and their programmes (I hesitate to use the
> > word software deliberately) might not only decode a data stream
> > called "morse" but actually interpret its "meaning" using rules
> > based on language, useage and machine-based artificial intelligence!
> >
> > In the same way that the modern radio amateur has become an operator
> > of "black boxes" who is to say that the next generation of Black
> > Boxes will not become an operator of radio amateurs?
> >
> > Some would say that this is alraeady the case!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 73 de Pat G4GVW es gd dx
> > Qth near Felixstowe, UK
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.5/1279 - Release Date:
> > 14/02/2008 18:35
> >
> > This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign
> > <http://www.firetrust.com/products/benign/>.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.5/1279 - Release Date:
14/02/2008 18:35
>
|
