To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: CW Skimmer |
From: | Peter Dodd <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:35:48 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <000501c87171$51b7c3e0$0b01a8c0@weazle> |
References: | <[email protected]> <000c01c87110$310844a0$0b01a8c0@weazle> <004501c87149$31997130$0301a8c0@g3kev> <000501c87171$51b7c3e0$0b01a8c0@weazle> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
J. B. Weazle McCreath wrote: Someone once remarked that ham radio was great - just that the QSOs were such a drag ;-).Mal wrote:No CW since 1974. How can you live without it !!!!! you must miss it !!Hi Mal, LFers, Not at all. Actually, I've done very little operating with any mode over the years of being a ham. I'm not one for conversation, but I do enjoy building and experimenting with antennas very much. As I said in my post, that's the great thing about ham radio, there's something for all of us, no matter what our specific interests may be. Peter, G3LDO |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 136 Beacon on, uwe-jannsen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 136 Beacon on, Mike Dennison |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: CW Skimmer, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: CW Skimmer, John RABSON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |