To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:26 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=M/7S8PhhHN0vr3sEvrEQSNG3/qVC1YtlQ0GuJSiSiQiaqsiFN3jtatd+FjV+vPzMeUUIVKkVClDto7vGJrG29kv2mTB8lPHr+H/ukgWCcvMMd1WKTN47CG4gh07A4ct4ZVZDpDX22m6IIwtAeRbs542H80WvLrBGfmbHZd//qiM= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Vernon this might tend to prove that the simulation is not modelling the travelling wave effect that gives the long low wire is directional preferences (??) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vernon Matheson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: Fenceline longwire > Rick that is surprising as I find them very directional and that the 1000' on the whole > has worked better than the 2000' but that could just be propagation. The 1000' is N/S > and the 2000' is E/W. > > Anything heard on the N/S is usually nulled on the E/W and vice versa. > > Vern > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re. HAARP, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, Roelof Bakker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, Vernon Matheson |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Fenceline longwire, G4gvw |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |