Mal,
who is to blame ?
Does Radcom refuse to publish technical articles to keep more space
for adds and "fairy tales" ?
Or is there not enough entry of technical articles?
I am closely cooperating with the editor of the UBA magazine
(CQ-QSO), every time it is a struggle to enough "input" to fill the
magazine with interesting stuff.
73, Rik ON7YD
At 10:55 25/10/2007, you wrote:
Radcom arrived today, about a week late. It took about 10 minutes to read
after skipping through the adverts, league tables and some fairy tales. The
actual technical info and construction projects are sparse. All UK radio
magazines seem to follow the same trend with too many adverts and stories
and very little construction projects.
If you can find some old Practical wireless or 73 magazines from 50 years
ago they are better presented with useful construction ideas and ccty. Some
thing along these lines would be more desirable today incorperating modern
technology.
Has anyone noticed there are no adverts for COMPONENTS to build the odd tech
article that does appear. The marketing procedure used at present seems to
favour books and pages of new equipment and gadgets and contest results.
Maybe no tech articles are being submitted for publication or are they not
being published.
Think of all the construction going on for 500 khz transmitters, and antenna
systems at present but nothing has appeared in RADCOM.
Does anyone else have an opinion.
Mal/G3KEV
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
|
