Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release...
From: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:22:46 -0700
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <056601c66732$7dba60b0$7900a8c0@athlon1200>
References: <[email protected]> <056601c66732$7dba60b0$7900a8c0@athlon1200>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
Dave

Your RX needs to be stable to within a Hz if it is Clicklock can deal with the variations... If the RX is say 2 Hz off calibration then simply offset the integer value set in phase scope to deal with this... RX stability to within a Hz (+- 0.5Hz) is the most important feature and most LF receivers do this well. Otherwise the Clicklock alg. can deal with it...

I'm sure Peter will go on and on about this shortly :-)

Good luck.
Scott


Dave Brown wrote:
Hi Scott
Wondering just how close to nominal does the tx have to be maintained to stay 'in view' so to speak?
73
Dave, ZL3FJ

----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>
To: "LWCA LF Reflector" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: LF: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release...


PhaseScope based on the 'Clicklock' algorithm by Peter Martinez, G3PLX is now available for download and testing by interested experimenters.

Download the archive here:
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/phasescope/

I have only tested it on a system running Windows XP. If you are interested in a MAC or Linux build let me know as the API used and the coding allows this... An earlier Linux alpha version was tested successfully...

The package comes with detailed instructions.

Comments and bug reports encouraged.

73 Scott



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.5/321 - Release Date: 21/04/2006







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>