Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas
From: Stewart Bryant <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:40:38 +0000
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:42:29 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <007001c62a34$97e808b0$2101a8c0@AUG2004>
References: <007001c62a34$97e808b0$2101a8c0@AUG2004>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Isn't there also a shielding effect that needs to be considered?

Once the antenna is the highest object in the area, I can see
that extra height might be a marginal effect. However as the
antenna is lowered the field is shielded from it by the
surroundings. It's like lowering the antenna into a 5
sided Faraday box, with the open side much less than a
wavelength across.

- Stewart G3YSX

Walter Blanchard wrote:
The theory behind the "height gain" observed using small LF active antennas at different heights has to do with compression of the near-earth LF potential gradient caused by the grounded "mast" holding the antenna.
The essential bit is that there is a grounded connection between the antenna and receiver, which may be just the outer of the co-ax cable. It would be an interesting experiment to repeat the "height gain" experiment without any connection to ground. This could be done by building an active antenna with a little transmitter to re-radiate the received LF signal (on 2.4 GHz?) and poking it up using a fibreglass mast. If the theory is right then there wouldn't be any height gain. Might do it myself sometime but anyone else interested?
 
 Walter G3JKV.
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>