Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

{Spam?} Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: {Spam?} Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas
From: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:48:06 -0000
Delivery-date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:49:22 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <007001c62a34$97e808b0$2101a8c0@AUG2004> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
John,

"Height gain" at LF/MF is caused by quite a different mechanism from the "height gain" at VHF.
VHF observations are irrelevant, I'm afraid.

Walter G3JKV.

----- Original Message ----- From: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: LF: {Spam?} Active_antennas


G8DSU has been doing some measurements on height gain at UHF and is also interested in active antennas at LF for cave radio purposes. I will copy this to him because I'm not sure whether he is currently reading this list.

John G3PAI

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 05/02/2006 at 09:14 Walter Blanchard wrote:

The theory behind the "height gain" observed using small LF active
antennas at different heights has to do with compression of the near-earth
LF potential gradient caused by the grounded "mast" holding the antenna.
The essential bit is that there is a grounded connection between the
antenna and receiver, which may be just the outer of the co-ax cable. It
would be an interesting experiment to repeat the "height gain" experiment
without any connection to ground. This could be done by building an active
antenna with a little transmitter to re-radiate the received LF signal (on
2.4 GHz?) and poking it up using a fibreglass mast. If the theory is right
then there wouldn't be any height gain. Might do it myself sometime but
anyone else interested?

Walter G3JKV.









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>