To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) |
From: | Alberto di Bene <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:31:06 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:32:09 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <000601c5b922$0e59f410$268cf8d4@standalone> |
References: | <000601c5b922$0e59f410$268cf8d4@standalone> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
Z-usanet-msgid: | XID667JiNofF0344X28 |
Andy wrote: Maybe I am missing something, but given that the ratio of primary to secondary voltage is a linear function of the turn ratio, if you compute : 240 / 0.3 = 800, then 800 is the turn ratio. If the secondary has just one turn, shouldn't the primary have 800 turns ?The one turn generated about 0.3V RMS from a 240V input, although after some prolonged testing as a CT, I realised I had got the turns calculation some way out, but thats by-the-way, (it was actually nearer 5000 than 4000). That suggested the turns ratio as approximately 4000 turns on the 240V mains winding. 73 Alberto I2PHD |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here), Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here), Alberto di Bene |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: Re: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here), Alan Melia |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here), Alberto di Bene |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |