| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: : Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here) |
| From: | "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:33:43 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:34:20 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <000001c5b9f2$d48dbc90$e6a4c593@RD40002> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks for your responses to this. I reduced the burden resistor to 440 ohms (for 0.1V/A) and got adequate linearity (with only 1V across the 240V secondary ! ) and have now managed to capture the voltage and current waveforms needed for the analysis. It really was a nasty little transformer. Next time I need to monitor mains current waveform will go the optical isolator route instead. They can give quite good linearity if used with care and a bit of feedback. Andy G4JNT -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 2005-09-16 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: can you help ?, Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LF: UNID TEST, Laurence KL1X |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: Current Transformers (off topic, but expertise probably here), james moritz |
| Next by Thread: | LF: ZM2E LF DX attempts 4 - 6 October, Vernall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |