To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Coil Winding2, de VY1JA |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:41:57 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <005c01c4ff30$ea189850$6401a8c0@eagles> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On 20 Jan 2005 at 20:45, J. Allen wrote: I was thinking of reducing the solenoid loss by paralleling two or more #17 wires and close-winding them. If I parallel wind three #17 wires will it be worth the effort in reducing coil loss or does a simple coil with only one #17 conductor make any sense here? I will be running 200 W for now. I made a coil some time ago with two parallel wires and it did not perform well at all. I do not know why. In any case, there is no point in spending too much time on the coil when the 'earth' (actually environmental) losses will be far greater. You would be better spending the effort on improving the antenna and insulation. Mike, G3XDV http://lf.apersonalguide.co.uk ========================= |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Coil Winding2, de VY1JA, Alexander S. Yurkov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: Frequency - List ?, Uwe Wensauer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Coil Winding2, de VY1JA, J. Allen |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Coil Winding2, de VY1JA, J. Allen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |