I scanned the whole of that page but all references to "spoler" seem to have
become "unspolen"
Bryan G3GVB
----- Original Message -----
From: Niels Rudberg Jørgensen <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:17 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Coil Winding, de VY1JA
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Allen" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 5:58 AM
Subject: LF: Coil Winding, de VY1JA
> LF,
>
> I have just spent three hours trying to find any practical information
on
> the Web on how to wind a honeycomb coil at home. I can see pictures of
the
> finshed coils but without some step by step photos of how it was done,
the
> pix of the finished product does no good here.
>
> There is no rush on this, because in the absence of information, I can
use
> existing materials and make a less efficient single layer solenoid with
one
> diameter conductor spacing, which will get me on the air for now.
>
> Does anyone know where the honeycomb coil winding data can be found?
>
> J.
>
>
~Hello!
Why honeycomb coil, basket weave etc?
In my humble opinion, the best way of making a high-Q coil or variometer
is to use the "pyramid" or "bank" winding method.
You may see the method mentioned in Terman, 1943-edition, pg. 84.
This method was used for decades by the manufacturers of e.g. marine radio
transmitters, primarily because it combines achievable high Q and modest
physical dimensions.
You may find detailed information on my home page: www.oz8nj.dk
This homepage is in danish language, but if you look after "spoler"
(=coils),
you will find a description in english and a number of photos.
BTW, talking of the separation of coil turns, do not believe in the
"one-diameter
separation", -- this idea is probable ok for short wave, but not in our
case.
I use RF Litz wire for my coils, I have, however seen old coils wound with
solid cotton-covered copper wire. It seems to me, that one should not
over-estimate the proximity effect.
73 =
Niels, OZ8NJ+
|
