LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz
From:	"John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:51:03 -0000
References:	<000d01c29c55$50845c00$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <[email protected]> <001101c29d11$db0d9320$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>

Screen captures of  72.400 to 72.401 kHz are being posted at :15 and :45 at:

http://webpages.charter.net/w1tag/cap-1.jpg

The "800" = 72.400 fairly exactly.

Great signal, Laurie! I can't ID the signal at 72.40028 kHz yet, though.
Peter?

John Andrews, W1TAG

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: Re: W4DEX Web site, (continued) LF: Re: Re: W4DEX Web site, John Andrews LF: Re: W4DEX Web site, g6tmk Re: LF: W4DEX Web site, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX LF: RE: W4DEX Web site, WE0H LF: Friday - Saturday Test?, John Andrews LF: Re: Friday - Saturday Test?, Laurie Mayhead LF: Re: Re: Friday - Saturday Test?, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: Re: Friday - Saturday Test?, lloyd chastant LF: Re: Friday - Saturday Test?, James Moritz LF: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews <= LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, Alberto di Bene LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo

Previous by Date:	LF: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews
Next by Date:	LF: Laurie's 72kHz sig, Alan Melia
Previous by Thread:	LF: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]