Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A
From:	"Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2002 02:58:47 +0100
References:	<000d01c29c55$50845c00$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <[email protected]> <002001c29fcf$8f5a4660$fde486d4@erica> <[email protected]> <000e01c29fdf$a705e520$cdce28c3@erica> <002c01c29fe7$5bcb3120$cdce28c3@erica>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0

g3ldo wrote:

Thanks to John and Dex for monitoring the signal frequency.

I am shutting the transmitter down now at 0100. Will be on at around 0515 to
test the enviorionment theory.

Received G3LDO with a fairly good signal, especially considering that the antenna was the
dipole for 80m, absolutely untuned on 73 kHz. Screen capture attached.

73 Alberto I2PHD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: G3AQC on 72 kHz, (continued) LF: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, Alberto di Bene <= LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo
Next by Thread:	LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]