LF: 73kHz T/A

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: 73kHz T/A
From:	"g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:43:48 -0000
References:	<000d01c29c55$50845c00$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <[email protected]> <002001c29fcf$8f5a4660$fde486d4@erica> <[email protected]> <000e01c29fdf$a705e520$cdce28c3@erica> <002c01c29fe7$5bcb3120$cdce28c3@erica> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	<[email protected]>



 Alberto  I2PHD said:

Received G3LDO with a fairly good signal, especially considering that the

antenna was the
dipole for 80m, absolutely untuned on 73 kHz.  Screen capture attached.

Thanks for the report Alberto.

k index now very low. Unfortunately it seems John will not be available
tonight and Dex has some lightning storms to the south. Still, if the k
index is very low it is worth transmitting. What about 136kHz?
I will be on 72.4004kHz from 2200 for a couple of hours.
Did an RF cirrent test on the antenna this morning at 0900 and it was 4
amps. These ups and downs of current seem to correlate with the tides - I
will make the data available when I have made more measurements.

Regards,
Peter, G3LDO

e-mail <[email protected]>

Web <http://web.ukonline.co.uk/g3ldo>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, (continued) LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: G3AQC on 72 kHz, John Andrews LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, Alberto di Bene LF: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo <= LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: Re: 73kHz T/A, g3ldo
Next by Date:	LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, Alberto di Bene
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: 73kHz T/A, John Andrews
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]