Re: LF: Bandplanning: QRS frequencies ....

["Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>]

At 10:06 10/07/99 +0100, G3WKL wrote:
> You may also prefer that we adopt the narrower the high-frequency
> allocation, that is 137.65kHz to 137.75kHz.
As long as traffic on 136kHz is at the actual level I prefer 137.6 - 137.8
for slow-CW. Although almost all activity is located arround 137.7 the
lower 'border' (137.6) makes it easier to filter out strong 'normal-CW'.
Regarding the upper 'border' I think that 137.75 only will create a 50Hz
'waste'. Besides that some hams (eg. IK1ODO) used to operate arround 137.78kHz

73, Rik


Rik Strobbe  ON7YD
rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be
Villadreef 14  B-3128 Baal  BELGIUM   (JO20IX)