Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+loop\s+antenna\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:42:55 +0100
There is an awful lot of controversy over the G3LHZ theories on loops...................... Yes, I accept this and you will see that I have included his formulae on my website with the proviso that I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00035.html (10,956 bytes)

2. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Thompson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:07:12 +0000
On Thursday 28 November 2002 13:16, Andy talbot wrote: There is an awful lot of controversy over the G3LHZ theories on loops...................... I found the following set of course notes very infor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00037.html (9,175 bytes)

3. RE: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:17:34 +0100
There is an awful lot of controversy over the G3LHZ theories on loops...................... Andy G4JNT Dear Dave, Rik, LF Group, At 06:36 28/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: I have just done a couple of cal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00038.html (9,298 bytes)

4. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:50:06 +0000
Dear Dave, Rik, LF Group, At 06:36 28/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: I have just done a couple of calculations on Rik's loop using formulae from Mike Underhill G3LHZ (which are quoted on my web site). Mik
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00040.html (10,169 bytes)

5. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:44:24 +0100
Hello group, many thanks to all who replied on my request. One more thought : if the loop would be very good (= low loss, let's say about 0.5 Ohm) this would mean high current and thus also rather hi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00043.html (9,861 bytes)

6. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:15:45 +0100
Hello Dave, A Q of 20 seems very low, it would mean that losses are as high as 5 Ohm (Q = XL/R). But maybe Q is calculated based on the Rrad of 2.5 Ohm, that would explain the low value. 73, Rik I ha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00044.html (11,657 bytes)

7. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:34:40 +0100
I am about to put up a transmitting loop antenna. Dimensions will be 23m long and 15m high. Thanks to Dick (PA0SE) I could achieve a wheel of 7mm litz wire, so wire losses should be minimized (about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00045.html (11,549 bytes)

8. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:22:35 +0000
Dear Rik, LF Group, I reckon your loop will have inductance of the order of 100uH, so with the kind of currents you are hoping to achieve, the voltage on the loop will reach at least a few kV. With t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00065.html (10,814 bytes)

9. RE: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:28:08 -0500
John A. says: Last winter, when I ran the 50ft perimeter loop, I found that laying out several 40 foot strips of chicken wire made no difference on the impedance bridge readings. That antenna was 15
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00067.html (9,266 bytes)

10. RE: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:17:54 -0500
Bill, I suggest the transformer approach because when the loop conductor will have some leakage current to the trees (it's small Mal <G>) and this will be minimized if the loop is allowed to float re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00068.html (11,138 bytes)

11. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:57:15 -0500
Bill, I suggest the transformer approach because when the loop conductor will have some leakage current to the trees (it's small Mal <G>) and this will be minimized if the loop is allowed to float re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00069.html (10,420 bytes)

12. RE: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:10:03 -0500
Loop Admiration Society members, and friends: You may like to consider a totally capacitor matching network as shown on my website. I suggest the transformer approach because when the loop conductor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00070.html (9,559 bytes)

13. Re: LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:09:31 +0100
I am about to put up a transmitting loop antenna. Dimensions will be 23m long and 15m high. Thanks to Dick (PA0SE) I could achieve a wheel of 7mm litz wire, so wire losses should be minimized (about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00071.html (11,643 bytes)

14. LF: loop antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:58:05 +0100
Hello group, I am about to put up a transmitting loop antenna. Dimensions will be 23m long and 15m high. Thanks to Dick (PA0SE) I could achieve a wheel of 7mm litz wire, so wire losses should be mini
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00081.html (11,100 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu