Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+XBand\s+500kz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+XBand\s+500kz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: XBand 500kz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:42:56 EDT; Thanks Mal G3KEV, for the xband contact tonight. I was using 50 watts to a 80/40 trap dipole. One of the problems with dual receive was the loss of the 500 khz signal when the auto atu was in cct for; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00006.html (8,827 bytes)
2. Re: LF: XBand 500kz (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:26:09 +0100; Just trying to get myself sorted out for this crossband stuff. Using my K2 on both 80m and 500kHz (via the Datong UC1) and relying on the 500kHz for my sidetone means I have to click the band up/down; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00009.html (10,220 bytes)
3. Re: LF: XBand 500kz (score: 1): Author: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:38:14 +0000; Hello LF, Dave & Mike A pile up! I was waiting to pounce on Mike G3YPE after Brian finished and F6BWO nabbed the QRG! I QSYd to 501.5 and 3530 and had a succesful x-band QSO - thanks Mike! This x-ban; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00137.html (9,537 bytes)
4. Re: LF: XBand 500kz (score: 1): Author: Peter Dodd <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:48:38 +0000; John, GM4SLV wrote: I had a question posed by a DL station about the legality of working us - since we're outside the normal "amateur service". My opinion is it's fine. I've asked John Gould for the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00198.html (9,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]