Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TXing\s+2200m\s+WSPR\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:42:16 +0000
Well ...    Using exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram, 50R transforms through the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss = 30dB,  VSWR = 1.07)   [Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.] So that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00340.html (18,233 bytes)

22. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:14 +0000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00341.html (13,708 bytes)

23. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:03:51 +0000
Hello Andy, Is there any point in Paul putting his dummy load on the end of his 75 odd meters of feeder co-ax outside? And then on the secondary of his matching transformer when tapped one to one? In
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00342.html (14,466 bytes)

24. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 18:14:31 -0500
The plot thickens! The square wave isn't exactly symmetrical but by that calculation it makes no more than 8 watts into the dummy load without the filter! It's likely a bit more because it isn't symm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00343.html (18,870 bytes)

25. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:16:40 +0000
Yes Try anything and try to work out what is happening.  But first of all, he needs to know what power being deliverfed into a 50 ohmsload is seemingly higher than it 'can' be.    The Vdd^2/2/Rl cann
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00344.html (15,903 bytes)

26. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 18:17:46 -0500
I think Chris has some really good ideas here. I did turn a test with the dummy load at the far end of the coax the other day. The amp didn't seem quite as happy as with the dummy load in the shack b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00345.html (13,009 bytes)

27. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:27:03 +0000
Hello N1(de)BUG, Thank you, I am flattered, but don't for one moment go thinking I actually know what I am talking about, for God's sake! I am just bouncing thoughts, after thinking what I would try,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00346.html (14,065 bytes)

28. Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 19:12:30 -0500
I had a thought. I set the HP 3325B to 10V pk-pk, ran it through the scopematch into the dummy load. Scopematch showed exactly the expected voltage and indicated 50 ohms, no reactance. Next I inserte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-12/msg00347.html (14,287 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu