Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Splitting\s+the\s+reflector\.\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Splitting\s+the\s+reflector\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:03:03 +0000; I think it rather sad and a sorry state of affairs for amateur radio that there are people out there who may not be interested in the technical side and presumably just want to be appliance operator; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00104.html (9,976 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:22:26 +0100; I think that Stewart has an excellent idea here. Martin Evans GW3UCJ How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00120.html (10,398 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:51:15 +0100; G3YSX wrote: How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then subscribers who do not want to see the postings can; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00123.html (9,421 bytes)
4. RE: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:53:38 +0100; I think it rather sad and a sorry state of affairs for amateur radio that there are people out there who may not be interested in the technical side and presumably just want to be appliance operators; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00124.html (9,903 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:07:41 +0000; How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then subscribers who do not want to see the postings can filter them s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00127.html (9,199 bytes)
6. LF: Splitting the reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Vincent Ferme" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:20:59 -0500; Group, My preference is that we continue using this mailing list for all LF related topics. I remember the QRP group going through the same debate no once but a couple of times in the recent past. Ot; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00141.html (8,648 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]