I think it rather sad and a sorry state of affairs for amateur radio
that there are people out there who may not be interested in the
technical side and presumably just want to be appliance operators.
I thought we were all supposed to be experimenters by virtue of the
amateur licence
How about, instead, the word OPER in the subject so we don't have to
bother with the who-heard-who messages.
Andy G4JNT
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2001-02-21 09:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Splitting the reflector.
How about in the short term we agree to put an unambiguous marker
in the subject line for the high tech postings (ie [TECH]) and then
subscribers who do not want to see the postings can filter
them straight
to the bit bucket.
Stewart G3YSX
Vincent Ferme wrote:
> Group,
>
> My preference is that we continue using this mailing list
for all LF related
> topics. I remember the QRP group going through the same
debate no once but a
> couple of times in the recent past. Other QRP mailing lists
have been setup
> but they failed to solve the perceived problems. They
actually caused more
> problems for people that did not want to miss anything and
subscribed to
> them and ended up having to deal with lots of cross-posted messages.
>
> Respectfully submitted.
>
> 73 de Vince, VA3VF.
--
The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s).
For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
| 