Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Slow\s+BPSK\s+Test\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:03:44 +0000
Tonight's WD2XES test will be a dead carrier on 137,577.309506014 Hz, interrupted only by CW ID's on the top and bottom of the hour. There will be no (intentional) phase changes at this end. The carr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00127.html (10,575 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:07:03 -0800
Markus I have similar images of various blue/violet arcs in the sky. However the best story is this... When I was commissioning this antenna for the first time I created a large orange fire ball in t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00135.html (13,572 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:46:55 EST
Hi Scott, corona - boy there's a few stories I can tell. With my ever-too-small antenna made from a pair of 0.5 mm enameled copper wires, I have to run 15 kV rms to radiate 200 mW, and it always glow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00136.html (10,450 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:02:23 -0800
Markus The test ended shortly after 0200UTC due to concerns of coronal discharge and antenna match xfmr saturation. I did some work on the antenna in the dark and elminated on source of discharge how
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00137.html (13,716 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:09:24 +0000
Markus - Yes, your report was from Saturday. Tnx. John A. hmm sorry John, that was Saturday, right? Markus In einer eMail vom 19.02.2006 21:53:55 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt MarkusVester@aol.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00138.html (10,363 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:00:33 EST
hmm sorry John, that was Saturday, right? Markus In einer eMail vom 19.02.2006 21:53:55 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt [email protected]: I viewed XES on Friday morning using Argo 120 slow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00139.html (9,889 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:53:19 EST
Hi John, Scott and LF Group, the gear is set up for receiving 137577.3 +-0.5 Hz tonight, recording 11025/10368 IQ-samples per second. I have connected a "proper" OCXO so stability should be better th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00140.html (11,020 bytes)

8. LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:29:09 +0000
WD2XES will try a run of slow BPSK on the following very odd frequency tonight: 137,577.309506014 Hz. This frequency appears to be clear of Loran lines for 1 Hz either side over a fairly large area,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00144.html (11,266 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:03:34 +0000
Thanks to Hartmut, Steve Dove, and Jean-Pierre for reports thus far. Peter Martinez did copy the signal last night, and is analyzing the data. The BPSK keying is clearly visible in his plots. We will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00196.html (10,761 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:49:02 EST
Hartmut, I believe such magnitude jumps are to be expected, due to the superposition of a phase-reversed signal from John and a constant-phase carrier from the Russian Loran. Markus In einer eMail vo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00207.html (10,810 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:42:16 +0000
Markus, Thanks. I had a rough start-up due to an earlier power failure, but hopefully everything is OK. John A. John and LF Group, I have started to record decimated IQ audio in a 2.7 Hz channel arou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00208.html (11,037 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:41:01 +0000
Hartmut, No, the power has been steady, as far as I know. We were out for about an hour after the start-up, though. The AC power was out here when I came home from work, so I'm hoping that the GPS-sy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00209.html (11,485 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:22:25 +0100
John, have you reduced power since 23:15? Hartmut WD2XES will again be running a test on 136.71875 kHz tonight, starting at 2230 or 2245. Reports and screen shots from the U.K. and EU would be welcom
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00210.html (10,564 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:05 EST
John and LF Group, I have started to record decimated IQ audio in a 2.7 Hz channel around 136718.75 for offline analysis. Unfortunately my receiver is not GPS-locked, just a simple temperature contro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00211.html (10,001 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:53:51 +0100
John, attached a screenshot, frequency not calibrated. Good luck Hartmut WD2XES will again be running a test on 136.71875 kHz tonight, starting at 2230 or 2245. Reports and screen shots from the U.K.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00212.html (10,569 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:34:34 +0100
It seems you started at 22:30. No problem with the Loran line here, with a faster screen. 73 Hartmut WD2XES will again be running a test on 136.71875 kHz tonight, starting at 2230 or 2245. Reports an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00214.html (10,365 bytes)

17. LF: Slow BPSK Test (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:06:02 -0500
WD2XES will again be running a test on 136.71875 kHz tonight, starting at 2230 or 2245. Reports and screen shots from the U.K. and EU would be welcome. The frequency was chosen for math reasons with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00216.html (9,550 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu