Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Receivers\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Receivers\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Receivers (score: 1): Author: Ko Versteeg <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:23:27 +0200; I am compiling a list of receivers and transceivers suitable for 136kHz. I know most of the older radios already but does anyone use a radio made in, say, the last five years that they use sucessfull; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00091.html (11,801 bytes)
22. Re: LF: Receivers (score: 1): Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:23:48 +0100; Hi Mike, Icom R-75: 'Consumer Reports' and 'Which?' magazine four-star best buy. As has been mentioned, the R-75 works very well out of the box at LF, and has become a fave amongst 'Lowfers' over her; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00092.html (12,669 bytes)
23. LF: Receivers (score: 1): Author: "J. Alan Lowe" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:07:29 +0100; Hello Mike, I confirm Laurence's (KL1X) view of 1 June 2004 that the Yaesu FRG100 is very good on LF. See the extract below. However, the noise blanker is not very effective. There is an optional 250; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00098.html (10,035 bytes)
24. Re: LF: Receivers (score: 1): Author: Ed Lesnichy <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:18:08 +0400; Dear LF-enthusiasts, MD> I am compiling a list of receivers and transceivers suitable During 3rd Rus LF DXpedition to UA0L I for the first time have seen old, but very interesting TRX - Yaesu FT-767G; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00128.html (10,526 bytes)
25. LF: receivers (score: 1): Author: Laurence KL1X <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:36:10 -0800; Mike - both on 137 and 500 the Icom R75 is really rather good both in sensitivity and selectivity and is still my receiver of choice. With or without the TXCO its reasonably stable down at LF - I sti; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00315.html (9,805 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]