The other fragment of the similar signal rx'd onto 504.950: http://rw3adb.narod.ru/2009/7sep2009_503.5kHz/503.5W_3_00010.jpg Roman antenna to reports -- Roman RW3ADB.
Graham is often difficult here too though, and I think this is related to a soundcard problem at his end. The fact that you're nearer will probably just exacerbate the effect. In general however it
Andy, I have been running WSPR (RX 137.5kHz) for some hours last night, but no copy. If you are still txing tonight I will give it another try. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
Andy, I looked for you yesterday for some while, nothing here in Kent at my QTH. Sorry to hear about the 'malfunction'! Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable. -- Original Message -- From: andy.g4jnt@google
What software generated that listing - its not WSPR.EXE is it? Andy On 25 January 2011 21:26, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote: Andy, Never seen you so strong. 2010-09-04 21:12
Didn't mean WSPR.exe - Freudian slip :-) It doesn't look like the listing from the WSPRNET site. I don't recognise the 0.2 value and the power level isn't shown ? I'm used to seeing reports like
Mine is a model 1000-WA-MFN-30. A big black heavy thing aruond 250 x 300 long x 150mm high, but suspect its innards are much the same. Ironic really, I used to have an old Naval HF-only load made
I guess so. http://wsprnet.org/olddb?mode=html&band=2190&limit=50&findcall=&findreporter=&sort=date is more user friendly and nicer than the one accessible from the wsprnet.org front page. But
Dear Andy, LF Group, The SNR for your beacon received here is up by 3-4dB, so in line with expectations. And talking of test loads. The 1kW 1GHz Bird attenuator increases its attenuation value as it
Andy this was what came out from the standard database report with the number of reports set to 500 and the timescale as "forever". I think the 0.2 is the power in watts. Are you still using the old
I'm only 4dB up in power. So either its propagation which seems unlikely over this short range, or your noise level is a lot lower. What software generated that listing - its not WSPR.EXE is i
