Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: WSPR Beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR Beacon
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:30:11 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TFRcTS9OEs25R6RlduUPX+WCLrI5ssqe81jXH+xfmig=; b=NOg9DY1uJQwDKMlC2kwydKG9CgHmBnlO2Sv/Y68/X77o6oChXqN6FXKfA4aSazjGvg ma7J76lQPlbvar8AnpBjbALO+BxrKjsvHep92Cg5cUWvDOrcB0jrMxCNTQOC+hdH91Gj 6jAJg9ya/0lddXepQ1mplG1SXkKJMGmZBcUXM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=embOiI5k3or6OwABVFUMlUGofAy5O7g9fOxQWtXP1RsEX8tVSG8ipg4EEBWPblbxcj DLjC6WlBZybkeZxrqOogbfDf+m9R8mxaOS9RAQZvVu18pmXWBuZx//B5R5ACn7bL1wnO Yf6xZuvY2Yx13jUUJwAWKFGHb13bfwoKz5Zpg=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <830F0804F1574EA8B4F36C4F30A5B0D4@JimPC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
I guess so. 
http://wsprnet.org/olddb?mode=html&band=2190&limit=50&findcall=&findreporter=&sort=date   is more user friendly and nicer  than the one accessible from the wsprnet.org front page.
 
But the power is not 0.2 watts.  I'm sending 33dBm, which comes out as 2 Watts (or 1.995W based on their unrounded calc).   Which, for once, is actually quite close to the truth.  I reprogrammed the PIC to update the power only this morning.
 
Andy


 
On 25 January 2011 22:20, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
Andy this was what came out from the standard database report with the number of reports set to 500 and the timescale as "forever". I think the 0.2 is the power in watts. Are you still using the old databae interface?

73s
Roger XBM

Sent from my iPod Touch 4g

On 25 Jan 2011, at 22:07, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:

Didn't mean WSPR.exe - Freudian slip :-)
It doesn't look like the listing from the WSPRNET site.    I don't recognise the 0.2 value and the power level isn't shown ?
 
I'm used to seeing reports like :
2011-01-25 21:56   G4JNT   0.503885   -15   0   IO90iv   +33   1.995   PA3ABK   JO21it   429   267 
2011-01-25 21:56   G4JNT   0.503875   +10   0   IO90iv   +33   1.995   M0BMU   IO91vr   119   74 
2011-01-25 21:56   G4JNT   0.503875   -3   0   IO90iv   +33   1.995   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   117 
 
Date, time, call, freq, S/N, drift, Loc, dBm, Watts, Listener, their loc, dist in km, distance in ancient
 
Andy
'JNT
 


On 25 January 2011 21:46, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
Just cut and pasted the filtered WSPR spots report Andy.  I've changed to the loop antenna which will account for some of the difference, but you are much stronger than the last time I copied your 500kHz beacon.

73s
Roger G3XBM




On 25 January 2011 21:35, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm only 4dB up in power.   So either its propagation which seems unlikely over this short range,  or your noise level is a lot lower.  
 
What software generated that listing - its not WSPR.EXE is it?
Andy
 

 
On 25 January 2011 21:26, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
Andy,

Never seen you so strong.

 2010-09-04 21:12   G4JNT   0.503874   +1   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 22:12   G4JNT   0.503874   -14   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 22:06   G4JNT   0.503874   -15   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:54   G4JNT   0.503874   -13   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:42   G4JNT   0.503874   -13   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:36   G4JNT   0.503874   -17   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:26   G4JNT   0.503874   -14   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:22   G4JNT   0.503874   -18   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-14 21:12   G4JNT   0.503874   -18   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:54   G4JNT   0.503874   -20   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:42   G4JNT   0.503874   -21   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:36   G4JNT   0.503874   -17   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:26   G4JNT   0.503874   -12   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:22   G4JNT   0.503874   -18   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:12   G4JNT   0.503874   -13   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-13 21:06   G4JNT   0.503874   -22   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-11 21:26   G4JNT   0.503874   -20   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-11 21:22   G4JNT   0.503874   -21   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 
 2010-08-10 22:22   G4JNT   0.503874   -20   0   IO90iv   0.2   G3XBM   JO02dg   188   35 

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
   
 
       
 
 




--
g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
www.g3xbm.co.uk
www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
   
 
       
 
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>