Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+502\.400\s+Dial\s+frequency\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+502\.400\s+Dial\s+frequency\s+\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:39:20 +0000; Signal on 503870000mHz, 33% T/R cycle being radiated now... Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00084.html (13,555 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:51:50 +0000; 1st decode was +1dB s/n 2nd dropped to -15dB That's QSB for you! Cheers, John p.s. Is there any chance of adding a more accurate (ie 6-figure) locator to the database? I think the WSPRnet database st; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00095.html (12,010 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:13:31 +0000; And it looks like Jim's stayed down on 502 - being reported by Mark and OH8HTG. That'll please the nay-sayers - WSPR spreading all over the band! Off out for a few hours, will leave RX running on 502; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00130.html (11,944 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:12:01 +0100; Jim, That looks to of gone quite well , Gary has just wired me , there are some new stations sending in spots to the wspr data base only thing on the 504 signal .. the quite zone looks to be only 100; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00166.html (12,888 bytes)
5. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:00:21 +0100; Hi Andy, LF, Just got a decode on new frequency but had not changed WSPR settings so it will report incorrect for 1st decode. Gary - G4WGT. Signal on 503870000mHz, 33% T/R cycle being radiated now...; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00214.html (13,189 bytes)
6. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:23:53 +0100; Jim's just moved up. Gay - G4WGT. And it looks like Jim's stayed down on 502 - being reported by Mark and OH8HTG. That'll please the nay-sayers - WSPR spreading all over the band! Off out for a few h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00261.html (12,568 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:14:11 +0000; Keep seeing mention of this WSPR database - feel a Google search coming on. Full locator is IO90IV, or more accurately IO90IV58EI (using GBR36 mapping) or IO90IV58AH (using WGS84) Andy G4JNT www.g4jn; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00329.html (14,432 bytes)
8. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:30:06 +0100; John, LF, I note that Jim's WSPR is showing 4 locator characters on my WSPR list but 6 on the spots page. Gary - G4WGT. 1st decode was +1dB s/n 2nd dropped to -15dB That's QSB for you! Cheers, John p; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00394.html (12,611 bytes)
9. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:26:43 +0000; Are you implying that the zone below 503.900 is not quiet ? Is it worth me moving to a frequency above .900 ? Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00526.html (13,779 bytes)
10. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:38:13 +0100; Dear John, LF Group, Oops! I was too busy posting the new frequency details to WSPRnet to notice I hadn't actually changed frequency yet! But interesting to see that with the rig, and the "dial frequ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00530.html (13,342 bytes)
11. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:05:23 +0100; Andy, Its possible .. but not much in it .. im seeing you signal fine and the wspr waterfall is quite clean .. i was getting false decodes on the lower frequency, but that was well into the noise are; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00567.html (13,895 bytes)
12. LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:46:23 +0100; Dear Graham, LF Group, I think the sensible thing to do would be to try it for a while, and see if people report problems. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Are we to adopt 502.400 Hz USB dial frequency; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00621.html (12,229 bytes)
13. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:24:05 +0000; Hello LF, I've retuned the RX setup to 502.400 and am awaiting signals. I have to be out of the house for a few hours soon, but (of course) everything will be left running and uploading to the WSPRne; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00704.html (11,696 bytes)
14. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:50:54 +0100; Hi Jim, LF, Not able to come on tonight, going out in a few minutes. OK for tomorrow night?? Gary - G4WGT. Dear John, LF Group, Oops! I was too busy posting the new frequency details to WSPRnet to no; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00722.html (12,964 bytes)
15. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:25:52 +0000; Andy,LF WSPR can be configured to automatically uplaod its received data to a website at http://wsprnet.org The database has had a revamp recently, and the "default" view doesn't allow you to select; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00741.html (14,593 bytes)
16. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:47:12 +0100; Dear Gary, Should be fine with me - I expect someone will still be broadcasting on 252kHz tomorrow! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00884.html (12,356 bytes)
17. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:03:29 +0000; Hello Gary, LF WSPR itself only transmits the 4-figures (eg IO90) but if you enter all 6 in the options dialogue of the software (along with your correct callsign, NOT K1JT - hi!) then any spots you; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00983.html (12,640 bytes)
18. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:44:21 +0100; Only seeing Jim at the moment. No sign of G4JNT 73s Dave G3WCB IO91RM 192159 6 -14 1.9 -9 0 M0BMU IO91 30 192759 6 -5 1.9 -9 0 M0BMU IO91 30 193159 7 -5 1.8 -9 0 M0BMU IO91 30 193959 7 -7 2.0 -9 0 M0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01059.html (12,665 bytes)
19. RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:45:31 +0100; John, LF, What a clever database, I had not realised & not done any research so thanks for the info. Should be on again tonight all being well with my new (M0BMU) buffer amp, the SBL-3 mixer seems to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01325.html (13,856 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]