To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? |
From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:51:50 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <B4B86DC7B7B84F648BB57AF66F5C3BBE@p4> <001c01c97fae$473a2600$0900a8c0@AM> <[email protected]> <006201c97fcd$5e425b00$0900a8c0@AM> <878CA1EB1E7349DC9464A021BE1B86B0@p4> <976D046F0BF44B39A9CC91C7306E969B@AGB> <1922ECE26C604A598E87CB82D9D69640@JimPC> <20090126182405.26668cad@lurcher> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:39:20 +0000 Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: > Signal on 503870000mHz, 33% T/R cycle being radiated now... > > 1st decode was +1dB s/n 2nd dropped to -15dB That's QSB for you! Cheers, John p.s. Is there any chance of adding a more accurate (ie 6-figure) locator to the database? I think the WSPRnet database stores the full 6-figure one when you report a spot, and then uses it from then on - as long as you've set 6-figures in the software options. Only 4-figures are sent as part of the beacon, and without an uploaded spot from you with 6-figure locator we're stuck with the lower resolution. Of course if you don't upload any spots then this can't be resolved? |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |