Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WRC\-2012\s+proposal\s+for\s+\'near\'\s+500kHz\s+band\(s\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:44:12 +0100
Dear David, LF Group, Having poked around inside quite a few radios over the years, I think 465/470kHz IFs were common in the days of discrete transistors and tuned IF transformers, but are mostly an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00264.html (13,916 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:50:58 -0500
Interesting I thought your system was better than the standard adopted in the US off the air signals are good but the FCC underestimated the power and at cut many lost enoughh signal for lock up. Mos
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00488.html (9,602 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:36:09 +0000
Or help me programme in a lower divider ratio into the DDS   'JNT     On 2 March 2011 16:20, M0FMT <[email protected]> wrote:   Wonderfull! and maybe you can help me grind all my crystals lower in fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00582.html (15,158 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:21:30 +0100
David es Co There are many thousands of old radios in use on AM medium and long wave around the UK es EU. also Lots of EU countries are still on band 1 TV, how about that for progress !!!! of course
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00605.html (11,761 bytes)

5. LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:29:32 +0100
David Good point, also my VFO does not go down that far. g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00743.html (11,368 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:20:48 +0000 (GMT)
Wonderfull! and maybe you can help me grind all my crystals lower in frequency as well Jim. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: James Moritz <[email protected]> To: [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00769.html (14,131 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:04:05 +0000
Many thanks for your comments, Jim, and for the detailed background explanation. I just felt we should be aware of possible potential problems. There could be many AM radios (or wirelesses!) still ar
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00798.html (10,640 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: WRC-2012 proposal for 'near' 500kHz band(s) (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:30:23 +0100
Bob The picture quality is good here on digital but I was talking about NEWS items where the digital FEEDS are vy poor, blurred images and jerky voice quality because of the narrow bandwidth used. an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00844.html (10,776 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu